|Yeah that's really helpful|
oh yeah this is gonna be so much better now.
There is another reason why editors receive such toe-curling, bland brochure-ware - and it's more common than you might think - and that's thanks to all the people that contributed to its creation.
For the uninitiated, here's a typical sign off cycle in a midsize tech company:
- The PR drafts the press release for a product launch, let's assume it's pretty good: it tells a story, makes a point, does it succinctly.
- Then the head of comms reviews it, make more of the key messages, it's a bit more evangelical, but what can you do?
- Then the head of product reviews it, and adds a load of technical detail that probably no one is ever going to read cos it's very boring.
- Then the head of sales gives it a quick once over, and just adds 'world's leading' to the company descriptor, cos he's read press releases before and they always have that.
- Then the head of the division takes forever to review it because he is so very important, and adds some outlandish testosterone-fueled statement that says more about him than it does about the product launch.
- Then the company lawyer reviews it, and she removes anything remotely interesting at all and what's left is littered with trademark symbols.
- Then, and only then, can the PR send it out - obviously three weeks late and to howls of derision from the very same journalists that she really rather admires and would very much like to impress...